The Learning Frame
Once I understood this chart, my work as an educator changed. Instead of rolling the rock uphill, I nudge the rock where it naturally wants to go.
PDF download: Learningframe
The Facilitation of Human Learning
I offer The Learning Frame as a picture of a structure for openness, where documentation and group learning create and sustain a strong learning culture. My colleague Rita Smilkstein calls it brain-based natural learning. Natural learning has passages ordered in the left column of the chart. It begins with the learner’s interest, learners then work, cooperatively if possible, on their own chosen intentions, express what they understand and can do in another form, share what they have newly acquired with others, and then take time to reflect on the process. It has flow, as Mihaly Csiksgentmihalyi calls it, a state of effortless concentration and enjoyment from start to completion. To create spaces for learners to experience that flow, educators offer opportunities appropriate for each room, depicted on the right half of the chart. In the final passage, learners reflect upon their experiences in the passages and, correspondingly, the facilitators analyze their role in the process and co-construct new pedagogical understanding. Both parties, the learner and the educator, are changed by these ordered intentions and reflective practices.
It is way beyond the scope this site to define and elaborate on what the words mean, but I think they are widely agreed upon concepts, with the possible exception of benefaction, which I offer as a more precise word for the learner’s activities in that fifth passage. The essential forces at work are documentation and reflection, enabling the educators themselves to discover the way as they live it, trusting in their shared wisdom and mindfulness.
Once I finally found the words that seemed precise, I printed a copy to refer to whenever I had to plan my own workshops or classes. I found it surprisingly useful, apparently because I can’t seem to hold the content of twelve boxes in my head at once.
Willingness to Understand a Structure for Openness
The problem I have faced in my professional life has been helping teachers understand that open learning opportunities have a structure necessary for them to be successful for all participants. Maybe it seems too obvious, or it may be so foreign that it is uncomfortable. My guess is that a structure for openness is difficult because most of us have grown up under authoritarian and coercive practices which seem normal. As students, we remained mostly passive, expected to listen as the teacher told us things, assigned things, and graded things. We had little choice but to acquiesce to the external prescription of content, time, activity, and method—despite hundreds of years of recognition that the traditions of school have little to do with how brains work and humans learn.
The interrelated ideas represented by The Learning Frame refer to understandings that have to be constructed not given. Those who have been participants in learner-centered, constructivist experiences may recognize familiar territory. Others may find it difficult to accept the idea that it is possible to trust that learners will learn best when allowed to lead, in amiable spaces, structured yet somewhat uncertain. Sometimes I think it is essential to personally experience the curiosity, energy, and generativeness of constructivist learning in order to see how everyone—participants, facilitators, and observers—is energized by the joy of the journey.
I know I have been afraid to relinquish control at times. I have imagined impending chaos, kind of dualistic thinking—which John Dewey called “either-or” thinking—either I have control or we have wildness. But teaching and learning isn’t on a control/chaos continuum. We have a third way where structure is tangibly present, behavior is trusted, and responsibility shared. Traditional power relationships are gone. What happens each day is essentially an experiment based on the best ideas that emerge from a reciprocal process where both learner and facilitator are learning at the same time. Gradually classrooms evolve a way to run more smoothly as a cooperative culture of inquiry follows natural intelligence, wisdom, and openness. It may seem like stepping off a cliff—air beneath your feet, falling into uncertainty, and hope to live to tell the tale—to realize how simple it becomes to lead a democratic learning community.
Disarming Power: the Learner as Protagonist
The Learning Frame drops coercion, disarms power, and avoids the word teacher. No one is imparting understanding to anyone else. Learners learn through gradually more challenging experiences, the same way most people learn most things outside of school—cooking, use smart phones, grow vegetables—where the learner chooses challenges motivated by their own intentions and curiosity. The challenge for educators is to create opportunities in the life of the school where the school is a stage and the play begins. The structure for openness is a way to create cooperative spaces for brains to work, as if to declare forthrightly, “You are human beings with the inherent wisdom to plan and shape all of our understanding. Let’s get started.” The opportunities provided and the skills and thoughtfulness of the facilitators will, over time and reflection, adjust and evolve towards something we all want: towards an aesthetic ideal.
The validity of The Learning Frame can be found in its resonance with everyday experience. When each of us learns something new and learns it deeply enough for it to become an integral part of ourselves, we recognize we have changed. Others do, too. We know from wearing a new vision prescription that brains somehow make sense of what is around us, which we must believe also applies to our changing phenomenological, cultural, interpersonal experiences. Schools evolve when a community of students, families and educators work together at creating relational spaces for learning. The Learning Frame attempts to convey how to do your part along the way.
I can empathize with the problem of how to start creating these non-traditional spaces and intentions. It may be impossible to see how to get from current practice to the place the Learning Frame describes. I know it has been helpful for me to have this one page reminder how the flow of learner’s passages alters the attentiveness of facilitators.
Passages for Learners
I liken passages to hallways or rooms which dominate a learner’s attention along the journey to transformation. Each passage leads to something unknown to be explored. The first three passages are a cycle that goes round and round again. Eventually the work evolves to a place where passage 4 opens up. The black background on the icons for passages 4, 5 and 6 is intended to mark that transition.
Attentiveness by Facilitators
Offer opportunities or experiences in prepared environments.
Document: record in any way possible the traces of what has transpired.
This happens in a myriad of ways. In general, documentation involves handwritten notes as well as audio or visual recordings, transcriptions of the learner’s dialogues with each other and group discussions, collections of products or constructions, and the educator’s discussions, insights, and logs.