Once I understood this chart, my work as an educator changed. Instead of rolling the rock uphill, I nudge the rock where it naturally wants to go.
PDF download: Learningframe
The Facilitation of Human Learning
I offer The Learning Frame as a picture of a structure for openness, as I call it, where documentation and group learning create and sustain a strong learning culture. My colleague and mentor Rita Smilkstein calls it brain-based natural learning. Natural learning has passages ordered by the biology in our heads moving down the left column of the chart. Passages begin with the learner’s interest, learners then work, cooperatively if possible, on their own chosen intentions, express what they understand and can do in another way they create, share what they have newly acquired with others, and after it all is done, take time to reflect on the process.
It has flow, as Mihaly Csiksgentmihalyi calls it, a state of effortless concentration and enjoyment from start to completion. To create spaces for learners to experience that flow, educators can offer opportunities appropriate for the learner’s stage as depicted on the right half of the chart. In the final passage, learners reflect upon their experiences in the passages and, correspondingly, the facilitators analyze their role in the process and co-construct new pedagogical understanding.
Both parties, the learner and the educator, are changed by these ordered intentions and reflective practices.
It is beyond the scope this site to define and elaborate on what the words mean, but I think they are widely agreed upon concepts, with the possible exception of benefaction, which I offer as a more precise word for the learner’s activities in that fifth passage. The essential forces at work are documentation and reflection, enabling the educators themselves to discover the way as they live it, trusting in their shared wisdom and awareness of what is happening now.
I have been working on this chart for many years trying to represent the forces of natural learning and transformation. I finally found words that seemed precise, I printed a copy to refer to whenever I had to plan my own workshops or classes. I found it surprisingly useful. At each passage I could look at its corresponding facilitator intention and invent something to try.
Willingness to Understand a Structure for Openness
The most difficult problem I have faced in my professional life has been helping faculty and early childhood educators learn to lead it. One reason might be that it’s uncomfortable learning a new way to behave. Another might be that it’s unfathomable to educators who have grown up under authoritarian and coercive practices, which is the way most of us experienced school. As students, we remained mostly passive, expected to listen as the teacher told us things, assigned things, and graded things. We had little choice but to acquiesce. That’s how most schools are organized in this culture, despite the obvious fact that the traditions of school have little to do with how brains work and learners learn.
The depth of the interrelated ideas represented by The Learning Frame cannot be conveyed in words very easily, since the understandings are constructed not given. Those who have been participants in learner-centered, constructivist experiences probably see it immediately: it’s natural life. Those with traditional do-as-you-are required school experiences often find it difficult to trust that learners will learn best in amiable spaces that are structured for openness and uncertainty. But we know the Learning Frame is “right” when we experience the curiosity, energy, and generativeness oneself and understand how all involved — participants, facilitators, and observers — are energized by the joy that is present.
Maybe people are afraid. I know what that feels like; I was afraid of chaos, too. The imagined lifting of control will lead to chaos — dualistic thinking — which John Dewey called “either-or” thinking: either we have control or we have confusion. That two headed arrow doesn’t apply here; this is something else entirely. Structure is tangibly present and behavior is orderly, without reliance on traditional power relationships. What happens each day is an experiment based on the best ideas that emerge from a reciprocal process where both learner and facilitator are learning at the same time. Gradually school runs more smoothly as the culture evolves based in cooperation and genuine interest. This culture of inquiry allows natural intelligence, wisdom, and openness to emerge. Those who build spaces for learners as depicted in The Learning Frame can let go of fear, step into uncertainty, survive, and experience for themselves the emerging richness of a democratic learning community.
Disarming Power: the Learner as Protagonist
The Learning Frame drops coercion, disarms power, and avoids the word teacher. No one is imparting understanding to anyone else. Learners learn through gradually more challenging experiences, the same way most people learn most things outside of school— cooking — smart phones — growing vegetables — where the learner chooses challenges motivated by their own intentions and curiosity. The challenge for educators is to create opportunities in the life of the school where the learners are actors and the school is a stage. The structure for openness is a way to create cooperative spaces for brains to work, as if to say, “You are human beings with the inherent wisdom to plan and shape all of our understanding. Let’s get started.” The opportunities provided and the skills of the facilitators will, over time, adjust and evolve towards an aesthetic ideal.
The validity of The Learning Frame can be found in its resonance with everyday experience. When each of us learns something new and learns it deeply enough for it to become an integral part of ourselves, we recognize we have changed. Others can recognize the change, too. We know from wearing a new vision prescription that brains somehow make sense of what is around us, which we must believe also applies to our changing phenomenological, cultural, interpersonal experiences. Schools evolve when a community of students, families and educators work together at creating relational spaces for living. To me, that’s the most useful way to define learning.
Passages for Learners
I can empathize with the problem of how to start creating these non-traditional spaces and intentions. It is difficult — and some think impossible — to see how to get from current practice to the place the Learning Frame describes. I know it has been helpful for me to see on one page how the flow of learner’s passages alters the attentiveness of facilitators.
I liken passages to hallways or pathways which dominate a learner’s attention along the journey to transformation. Each passageway leads to something unknown to be explored. The first three passages are a cycle that goes round and round again. Eventually the work evolves to a place where passage 4 opens up. The black background on the icon for passages 4, 5 and 6 is intended to mark that transition.
Attentiveness by Facilitators
Offer opportunities or experiences in prepared environments.
Document: record in any way possible the traces of what has transpired.
This happens in a myriad of ways. In general, documentation involves handwritten notes as well as audio or visual recordings, transcriptions of the learner’s dialogues with each other and group discussions, collections of products or constructions, and the educator’s discussions, insights, and logs.